- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007




I think I would have swapped the Red and the Orange lines on the map so that they would appear to be going in the directions that one would drive on a two-way road — i.e., clockwise on the outside and counter-clockwise on the inside.
Good spot. Originally, the designer, Jacob Peel, created the map that way. We wanted to match the sides of the road for driving. But then we needed to put the Red and Green Lines nearby each other to show the timed transfer. That ended up being higher priority.
It was a trade-off. Do you agree with this? Could you think of a different way to do it?
A couple of thoughts…
1) Red and green together are bad for colour-blind people. Maybe use purple instead of red
2) The map doesn’t highlight that blue has a timed transfer to red and orange. The fact one is highlighted for red/green implies the other transfer points aren’t timed.
While I like how the timetable works with just two vehicles (cunning!), the number of trips per day on each route seems very low.
Hopefully 2012 will bring a successful season of transit in Yellowstone, and it will become possible to increase the level of service in the future!
1.) I understand the issue regarding red and green. We discussed this, and may revisit the issue. The limitation here is that it would be nice to have continuity with the service names from last year.
2.) We spent a lot of time thinking about transfer points in the system. We have indicated the in-seat transfers in the timetable at Madison Picnic Area, which, for the purposes of the passenger are even better than timed transfers. But the only “timed transfers” in the system, in the sense of one vehicle holding for another, are at Grant Village between the Red and Green routes.
Our concern was that it was important to have consistency in the meaning of symbols in the map. We also did not want to introduce too many different symbols.
If we were to introduce a way of indicating in-seat transfers at Madison, what do you think would be best? Should we copy the approach we used at Grant Village (colored “T”)? Introduce another symbol that means “in-seat transfer available”?