Balancing the budget by generating more riders through word-of-mouth
This book review and discussion of The Anatomy of Buzz appears in the latest issue of More Riders Magazine, along with the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit interview. Here are some good, simple ideas for tapping into riders as a marketing force. Online social media, if used well, may be an effective tool to support some of these strategies.
Transit agencies should run word-of-mouth ridership campaigns based largely off of Emanuel Rosen’s book The Anatomy of Buzz.
He offers a roadmap on how successful companies and causes have embraced buzz – person-to-person communications about a product or service – to generate more customers. In this article, I’ll apply these powerful principles to public transportation agencies facing the need to generate more ridership (particularly off-peak riders) to generate more revenue. My hope is that leaders of agencies will devote existing staff and resources towards the simple (and often free) steps to affirmatively generate buzz among riders and supporters that will lead to increased ridership (and increased farebox revenue).
Public transportation enjoys several attributes that make it particularly well-suited for generating buzz. It is communal in nature: people ride together. It is a visceral experience unlike, say, choosing a browser or a credit card. And agencies’ status as a government agency with regular board meetings make it very easy to generate earned media (something most private corporations very much envy).
With all these inherent advantages over private corporations in generating word-of-mouth among customers, why do so few public transportation agency leaders use buzz-generating tactics to build more riders?
Perhaps for some leaders, earning more riders is not a goal. They would prefer to manage whatever riders happen to show up and do the best job with the resources they have been provided. Hopefully you – as a reader of More Riders – have a different philosophy for public transportation based on perpetual growth instead of stagnation. For you and those like you who believe in increasing ridership, successfully employing buzz-generation tactics is likely one of the easiest and cheapest ways you can earn more riders.
I’ll share a few of the most compelling tools from the book.
First, it’s important to recognize that word-of-mouth happens about public transportation. People talk about it. Some people promote your service. Some people recommend to their friends to avoid it. These person-to-person comments – what Rosen defines as “buzz” — is one of the most powerful forces to either get a potential rider on the bus or keep them away. So how can we influence the buzz about your bus?
Maximize the number of positive comments. According to Rosen, research shows that positive comments from people who have experienced the service are most likely to bring in sales. How to do it? Ask for it! Ask your customers to tell their friends to ride with them. Explain to them that they can help strengthen public transportation by recruiting a friend of two to ride. And ask them to ride more often.
Tell Our Story. At the CTA’s Armitage stop, the mural is filled with stories of riders. Encourage your riders to share their stories with you. But even better: tell our story. Tell our story of how transit makes our city grow, how we are breaking our nation’s addiction to foreign oil, how we are improving the environment, so that every single time someone chooses to ride instead of drive, she can feel good about joining that story. And she can tell someone else and encourage him to ride instead of drive.
Inject suprise into the ride. Recruit a local celebrity (a newscaster or professional athlete) to help promote transit. And have him or her show up on the bus one day to pass out a free bus pass to everyone on that ride. Everyone on the bus will talk about that experience to almost everyone they know. And some of the people they talk to will decide to ride.
Ask for participation. Every business and institution along every route has an interest in promoting their route. Give them the tools and permission to develop their own route map that promotes their business (the timetable and your standard route map) and when some of them do develop their own route map, watch how aggressively they distribute their own route map and share what they have created.
Think of every rider as a potential salesperson for recruiting another customer, and the rest of the buzz-generating campaign will fall into place.
The Anatomy of Buzz Revisted by Emanuel Rosen is published by Doubleday.
Google Transit: Some numbers from Missoula, Montana
In June of 2008, Mountain Line transit in Missoula became the first (and still only) agency in Montana to participate in Google Transit. Recently, I reached out to find what kind of ridership increase, if any, they can attribute to Google Transit.
Jordan Hess is a planning student at the University of Montana in Missoula. He has also contracted with Mountain Line to put them on Google Transit and maintain the information. Here’s what he has to say about ridership trends since the Google Transit launch. What stood out to me was that ridership for July of 2008, one month after the Google Transit launched, increased by 31% from July of 2007.
We went live with Google Transit on about June 1st of last year with a rather soft launch (i.e. no immediate press releases, etc.) Our first press coverage was on June 25, with a front page article in the local paper, available at http://www.missoulian.com/articles/2008/06/25/news/local/news04.txt
In the four months following our initial press coverage of Google Transit, ridership jumped 20.08% from the previous year. As much as I would like to attribute this exclusively to Google Transit, there were other complicating factors. Of course, in 2008, gas prices were climbing so that brought more people onto the bus.
Also, in 2008, a local business sponsored “Fare-Free Fridays;” essentially they paid the cash fare equivalent for every Friday that summer. In 2007, however, there were a number of fare-free days due to poor air quality. We had a terrible forest fire season in 2007, and when air quality drops below a certain threshold from smoke or particulate matter, the county health department subsidizes the fare. I’m trying to look into the total number of fare-free days each summer, as that may have had an effect.
Additionally, in October, the adult cash fare went from $0.85 to $1.00. This seemed to have an effect on ridership as well. For the entire period from July 1 to Feb 28, we had a total ridership increase of about 12.78%, with ridership this winter nearly the same as last winter.
Interestingly, in July, the month immediately following our launch of Google Transit, we had an increase of 31.58% from 2007 to 2008. For the sake of comparison, the month of May saw only a 7.83% increase from 2007 to 2008.
Thanks for the info, Jordan! Does anyone know of other agencies on Google Transit with interesting ridership numbers?
Online information and its effect on ridership
The connection between easy-to-use customer information (schedules, maps, etc.) and transit ridership seems obvious. And online tools provide a powerful way to make transit information easier to use (remember: unfamiliar transit riders find conventional maps and schedules difficult to use; in fact, in one study, they failed to plan trips about half of the time).
I am searching for, and cataloging, studies and accounts of online transit information and its potential, or observed, impacts on ridership.
Today, I turned up “The Effect of ITS on Transit Ridership” (Abdel-Aty, Mohamed A.; P.P. Jovanis. ITS Quarterly. Vol. III. 1995). Unfortunately, the article is old (1995) and the ITS Quarterly is not published online. But the literature review paper (“The Factors Influencing Transit Ridership: A Review and Analysis of the Ridership Literature”) gives a few highlights:
ITS-delivered transit information might encourage shifts to transit: 58.7 percent of respondents were likely to use transit at least once per week given the availability of ITS-delivered transit information, and about half of the non-transit users who might consider transit would be more likely to use it if certain information items were available.
I wish the whole paper was available. Does anyone know of other research on the connection between online information, or customer information in general, and ridership?
Two years after: Google Transit for Humboldt County
Last Saturday, I presented at the Wheels of Change conference in Humboldt County, CA by video conference.
Trillium client Humboldt County was roughly the 17th area in North America to join Google Transit. Since that time, the main transit agency, Redwood Transit System, has posted a greater than 40% increase in ridership. They have one of the best farebox return ratios of any rural transit system in California.
Now there are more than 115 North American areas include in Google’s transit trip planner. It’s exciting to see and report this progress.
The audience was particularly interested in future possibilities for online transportation information. I showed Walkscore.com’s transit time maps, ByCycle.org, and Atlanta’s multi-modal trip planer, among other projects.

